Monday, March 15, 2010

dog training prisoners

(http://www.wsmv.com/family/21538425/detail.html)

This story talks about inmates training dogs that would otherwise be put down, allowing prisoners association with animals and a worthwhile activity. The rehabilitated dogs are later given to families.

This sounds like a good plan to me, just as long as the people in charge of distributing dogs to the prisoners makes sure that none of the prisoners have been convicted of abuse to animals or humans, or of course murderers--since apparently the prisoners are in complete control of the dogs, it would be horrible for the prisoner to get sick pleasure from hurting the animal. Hopefully the prisoners are screened before being given another life to take care of; surely their work with the dogs is monitored.

But as long as the dogs are in decent hands and their lives are saved, and prisoners are given something good to do with their time, more power to them. There's no doubt that caring for an animal can be extremely therapeutical, and hopefully the inmates will become more compassionate people as a result.


Friday, March 12, 2010

Starving an animal isn't serious, just a misdemeanor

According to Lee Maddox of the Tennessee Farm Bureau, refusing to or neglecting to provide an animal in one's care with food or water need only be deemed a misdemeanor and "the punishment should match that crime"( http://www.wsmv.com/news/22825832/detail.html).

Back in February, five malnourished, sick, starving horses were taken from the property of Edward Whiticker of Sumner County. He was sentenced to one year of probation and had to pay 1,000 dollars to a volunteer group who helped care for the starving horses. He supposedly will not be allowed to own horses again.

First of all, there have been numerous stories about animal abusers being told they cannot own or adopt certain animals, but a simple relocation would solve that problem, since the restrictions are based on state legislation, not national. Second, he's been told he can't own horses. But what's going to keep him from owning other animals? Some may say he'll probably learn from his "mistake," but is complete neglect of five horses just a mistake? What people need to realize is that if you are going to own animals, take care of them. No one says you have to own animals. It's a choice. Even if a stray cat or dog shows up on your doorstep, you don't have to keep it. It's a living thing, not an object.

But how many people can say a stray horse has ended up on their doorstep, and out of the goodness of their heart (hahaha) they kept it? How about five horses? Very unlikely. But whether an animal shows up on your doorstep, is given to you, you adopt it, purchase it, or acquire it by other means, if you consent to caring for it and keep it in your vicinity, its wellbeing is your responsibility. This man most likely purchased these five horses--for what, I do not know. Apparently for nothing.

So he serves a year on probation, is down 1,000 bucks, and can't own horses in Tennessee anymore. Five horses suffered for who knows how long and almost died. Five innocent horses. Is that really a fair trade-off?

A bill has been proposed to strengthen animal cruelty laws in Tennessee and to have them applied to all animals. This would be great if it passed. But, there's always a "but." But, according to WSMV-TV Nashville, "The Tennessee Farm Bureau has influence on the state agriculture committee, and that means this bill will probably die next week."
Obviously it's about money. It almost always is.

So the Tennessee Farm Bureau doesn't want livestock included in the bill. There has never been bill against animal cruelty to pass in Tennessee that included livestock. But if the TFB is so worried about livestock being included, there must be happenings that they don't want exposed. But if the animals they use for farming are farmers' tools, why wouldn't they want to keep them in tip-top shape? I guess because that would require time, effort, money, and a little compassion.

I just long for the day when animals will be treated as living things, not as commodities. I can always hope.

Sunday, February 28, 2010

Free Tilikum!...or at least don't isolate him from the other whales.

Orca whales are one of my favorite animals of all time. I saw Free Willy at the theater when I was five, and I've been hooked ever since. I've been to SeaWorld once. I loved getting to see my favorite animal up close. I wanted to work there one day and train the orcas--that was my ultimate dream. I didn't think about how sad it is that the whales are taken from their natural environment and put on display in tanks. I think that's why I liked Free Willy so much--they FREED him. Willy was taken from his family and put into a small tank where he was expected to perform. When they finally figured out that what he wanted was to be back with his family, they gave him that.

Orcas are one of the most social, family-oriented creatures on this planet. One of the reason whalers are so successful is because whale pods stay together--a whale won't leave an injured family member. If only all humans were so compassionate. Orcas have gotten a lot of criticism in light of the recent death of a SeaWorld trainer by Tilikum, the park's largest orca whale. Apparently Tilikum "has been valuable property for the resort through the years, both as a stud who has fathered 13 calves and as a performer who delights audiences with outsized splashes." (http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2010-02-25/news/os-shamu-kills-trainer-tilikum-20100225_1_killer-whale-orca-network-curator-of-animal-behavior)

He was often kept away from the other orcas in an isolated tank--the complete opposite of how he would live in his natural environment. Furthermore, the fact that he has been used extensively as a breeding device also plays into his apparent aggression--thank you, testosterone.

I understand that sea animals in venues such as SeaWorld are good educational tools. But obviously they are not domesticated and can be unpredictable. I cannot see how anyone can put blame on Tilikum. I feel sure he was not trying to kill his trainer, and he most certainly wasn't acting out of spite--that is a uniquely human trait; we've got the bragging rights to spite.

Animals attack when their instincts tell them to do so. Either they feel afraid, threatened, or desperate. I don't know what exactly happened that day at SeaWorld to make this whale's emotions change and his instincts tell him to react in the way that he did, and I doubt anyone knows other than Tilikum. But something happened that wasn't quite right. Either the whales and other aquatic animals can continue to be captured and trapped in artificial environments and more humans' lives can be put in mortal danger, or we can leave the whales in the ocean to be with their families and live naturally. Which option sounds better?

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

A Serious Issue

I recently came across several articles the discussing the same proposed legislation in California.






These articles refer to the bill in California, but say that other similar legislations have been proposed in other states, including Tennessee


The Animal Legal Defense Fund has some valuable information on its website, http://exposeanimalabusers.org/article.php?list=type&type=163


I think this is a great idea. The tax on pet food to pay for it would be minimal and hardly a drop in the bucket overall. There have been multiple cases where people started out torturing animals and moved on to people. I think animal abuse is one of the worst offenses possible because animals are completely innocent. Both animals and children rely on adults to care for them, and to take advantage of an animal's innocence by overpowering and abusing it is sick. I would love to see for a bill like this to get passed in Tennessee. Sign the petition to get notification sent to your state legislators telling them you are in favor of an animal abuser registry.

Monday, February 22, 2010

Unconditional Love: A Rarity

Unconditional love--what is it? Is it the love between a mother and a child? In most cases, yes, but unfortunately not always. We've all seen the news stories about mothers drowning their children or driving off bridges with the kids strapped in the backseat, and other situations fit for a horror movie.

Certain religions, including Christianity, believe their higher powers to be sources of unconditional love.

We'd like to think the love between a husband and wife is unconditional, but that is, unfortunately, almost never the case.

So, if you don't have kids, aren't religious, and suck at romantic relationships, are you tough-out-of-luck when it comes to unconditional love?

Of course not.

Man domesticated animals many years ago for the purpose of companionship. These domesticated animals are therefore virtually unable to survive on their own in the wild, as they have been bred to be pets. Companion animals. Another breathing body to be with you in times of trouble, uncertainty, pain. Someone who will love you no matter what. When your husband leaves you for his secretary, your best friend moves across the country, your parents have deceased, you've still got your dog beside you for consolation.

He doesn't care whether you dress in your best clothes and your makeup is perfect or if you stay in your pajamas all day, drowning your sorrows with ice cream--he'll even gladly lick the bowl for you when you don't feel like doing the dishes.

All pets ask is that you give them food, water, shelter, and a little attention every now and then. In return they'll do their very best to please you and beg for forgiveness when they upset you. Who wouldn't want that?

It's even proven that pets improve overall health, both physical and emotional. But I'll save that for another day. Now I'm going to go play fetch with my furry little best friends.

Introduction

Hello, all. My name is Becca and I'm a junior in college. My ultimate passion in life is animals--taking care of them, observing their behavior, and protecting them and treating them humanely. I have two dogs and two cats at home right now, as well as a few at my parents' house. Each person in my family, immediate and extended, has at least one pet. I lived in a dorm my freshman year of college and therefore didn't have any pets. I barely survived that year, and made frequent trips to feed and attempt to communicate with the feral cats behind the library. My major goal in life is to help protect animals from violence and help them to be treated humanely. This includes pets, farm animals, wildlife, etc. So I'll pretty much be posting about issues relating to animal rights as well as personal experiences with animals.